One of many indications that ours is a culture sliding out of civilisation is the proliferation of jargon – and jargon of a particularly silly kind.
Jargon matters, jargon is a real and significant evil, because it is a substitute for thought. It makes its contribution, like other instances of sub-literacy, to the decline of some of those key things that have always been considered essential elements of a civilised culture – and of a civilised person. It also matters because it seeks either to deceive listeners or simply to exclude them. It is not an aid, but a barrier, to real communication.
Jargon is a substitute for thought just as a takeaway is a substitute for cooking: the first is as injurious to mental health as the second is to physical wellbeing: mens stulta in corpore stultum. Assure someone you will re-visit the issues and deliver effective targets… and you say nothing, having thought nothing: you simply hide a piece of prevarication behind words that sound weighty but in fact are empty, deceiving yourself into feeling like a smart communicator just because you have uttered a few plastic words that slid all too easily into the mind from off the language rubbish-tip that is management speak. It is just like filling one’s stomach with plastic ‘food’ from the drive-in burger bar – feeling superficially satisfied, while in reality just poking into the body one more prod towards ill-health.
Jargon is an attempt to deceive one’s listeners, because it seeks to silence opposition without true argument. Add a trendy postlude to your claim – such as ‘I think that’s the way forward’ – just after you have said precisely what your listener has already argued against, and you lay claim to a finality and authority that you do not deserve: you have not earned it by the slightest process of reasoning or communication.
And jargon is socially destructive. It seeks to set up a pseudo-smart coterie of those who are ‘where it’s at’. It is exclusive – in a purely negative sense. Not the intellectual elitism to which all may aspire and which it is the purpose of education to give access: that, positive and culturally enhancing though it is, has of course become unfashionable in these easy-going, tick the box, drop the standards days. This is an elitism to which nobody need aspire, for it achieves nothing – and which is not merely irrelevant to education, but works against its true aims.
How ironic, then, that some of the worst jargon-mongers in the Britain we have inherited from Tony Thatcher and Margaret Blair are ‘educationalists’ – and those teachers who have, to the shame of the profession, followed them.